On June 20, 2005 The Wall Street Journal
announced that Google is entering the online payment space. But the project had
been in the company's sight long before that. As early as the fall of 2004,
business development people at the GooglePlex were busy contacting other
players in that space.
The announcement turned the technology industry abuzz. On Wall Street, Google's
shares rose while eBay's went down.
Since its inception Google has went a long way in making information
accessible to everyone in a useful way. Hundreds of millions of people use the
Google search engine to find information. The site is offered in many languages
- from Afrikaans to Zulu .
In addition Google lets you search anything from pictures to movies, to
shopping products, to driving directions. But that is all common knowledge.
What is interesting to me is how Google is making paid services available for
free.
A company called Keyhole sold access to its terabytes of satellite images
through its keyhole software. Google purchased the company and dropped the
price of
its software to $29.95/month. Soon after Google released is free version of the
keyhole software under the name Google Earth.
A company called Urchin provided web analytics solutions to Fortune 500
companies. Google bought Urchin and dropped the price of
its hosted solution to $199/month. Recently Google made the Urchin software
available for free under the name Google Analytics
Why would Google want to pay millions of dollars for a company and then make
its product available for free? I think it makes sense to do so.
Free fends off competition
It's hard to compete against a free product.
Free creates synergy
Adding
free products enhances the value proposition of existing products. As an
example Google AdWords lets website owners display ads on Google's search
engine. Google Analytics gives website a detailed view of how their customers use
their site including who is buying what. With AdWords alone the website owner
can only see which keywords are bringing in more users to the site. But he has
no way of knowing which keywords are bringing the users who are making the
highest value purchases. This is where Analytics comes in.
Free enhances Google's relationship with its
existing customers
It's
like Budweiser girls giving out free beer at a party. At the end of the party
everyone is going to like Budweiser. All kids like Santa Claus.
Free is for profit
In
many cases a product can make more money if it is free than if it is being
sold. Tidnings
AB
is a Swedish company that popularized the
concept of handing out free newspapers to commuters every morning. The company
started its experiments in Sweden
's
Tunnelbana (Swedish for subway) and now has 59 papers in 86 major cities
in 19 countries. This is thanks to ads of
course. Although Google gives out
Google Earth for free. Keyhole’s software does power Google Local – a tool to
search for businesses, products, and services in your vicinity. And Google does
earn money each time a searcher clicks on the ads that appear alongside the
local search results.
Free is what consumers want
In
a recent article, News.com quoted an internal Microsoft
document as saying that the company is making only $2 for each copy of Works
that is bundled with new computers and that the standard version of Money
doesn't even break even. MSN workers were quoted as saying that “The outlook
for the packaged consumer retail software market is poor," and that
"The size of the market is shrinking, and consumers appear less willing
than ever to buy software applications off the shelf.". Clearly it is getting
less and less possible to sell software to consumers.
If
the pattern is to give everything away for free then why does Google need a
payment system?
Google's mission is to
organize the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful.
Some of that information is not free. And one way of making this information
accessible is by giving publishers an easy way to sell that information and giving
consumers an easy way to buy it.
It
might be weird to think about it that way but Google is clearly a market in
which hundreds of thousands of content owners sell advertising space to
hundreds of thousands of advertisers. Supply and demand determines the price of
a product. Some keywords sell for 5 cents while some can go up to more than $90
per click.
The
New York Stock Exchange has a clearance system
for equity buyers and sellers to exchange money after the trade is done. EBay
has PayPal for buyers and sellers to exchange money after the trade is done. But
according to sources Google uses a third party payment processing system. With
the big volume of money being exchanged it would make sense for Google to build
its own payment system and operate it under its brand.
Patent
number 20040122811 is titled ‘A method for searching media’.
The patent outlines a method for searchers to buy premium content such as
magazine subscriptions or pay per view articles directly from the search page. Larry
page is behind the patent and Google owns it.
Site
cloaking technology has enabled publishers to feature their paid content on the
Google search results, but redirects the user to a payment page when the user tries
to access the content. The technology is based on detecting the type of browser
as well as the IP number of the machine accessing the page and doing different
things if the machine is a crawler or an computer.
Froogle
is Google’s shopping search engine. Consumers use Froogle to search for
products across multiple vendors and compare prices and models. Right now, the
final purchase happens on the vendor’s site using this vendor’s payment system.
Amazon has one-click buying. Can Froogle offer that convenience?
Although
Google has offered free versions of its software to consumers it still charges
money for some of it. To revisit the Keyhole example: Google Earth is free but Google
Earth Plus adds ‘GPS device support, the ability to import spreadsheets,
drawing tools and better printing’
and costs $20/year. Google Earth Pro is for businesses and professionals and
sells for $400/year. How will businesses pay for those services?
The Strategic Value
of Google Payments
Google needs to diversify its revenue sources
According to the Wall Street Journal, Google made 99% of its $3.2 billion revenue through
advertisements in the 2004 fiscal year. The remaining 1% came from its
corporate search products: the $3000 Google mini and the $30,000 Google Search Appliance.
But relying on advertising revenue alone makes Google more
vulnerable in case
of a financial downturn similar to what happened to Yahoo! in the late 90's
when big advertisers suddenly cut their advertising spending.
Nothing
explains that fact more than the recent surge in interest in AOL. America
Online is Google’s biggest affiliate partner in the AdSense network. It
generates roughly 12% of Google’s revenue. Recently AOL’s contract with Google
expired and MSN and Yahoo! have showed great interest in securing a contract
with the company or maybe even buying it.
If
such a deal is secured Google’s revenue would be greatly affected.
Defensively,
stepping into online payments buffers the risks associated with a reduction in
ad spending.
The
internet is full of interesting business models. But they are all different
variations of two basic models:
- Giving away a product for
free and monetize it with advertisements
Selling a product for a price
Google
already dominates the online advertising market with its AdWords and AdSense
products. AdWords lets advertisers display advertisements on the Google search
engine as well as other partner websites. AdSense lets online publishers and
website owners to monetize their content by displaying ads on their sites. The
publishers share the revenue with Google when a visitor clicks on an ad.
If
Google Payments sees similar success, then the company will be in a sweet spot
position. It will be the only internet company with control over the two gates
that separate publishers from their profits. Gate 1: Ads. Gate 2: Payments. And
that would be a leverage point for the company’s future aspirations.

The PayPal Connection
Soon after the WSJ article announcing Google's entry into the online payment
space Eric Schmitt told the Associated Press: "We do not intend to offer a
person-to-person, stored-value payments system".
Most people took this statement as a guarantee that Google will not be competing
with PayPal. I think that interpretation is not quite right.
PayPal and Google Payments Intersect
According to MIT's Technology Review,
71% of PayPal's business came from eBay in Q1 of 2005. That constitutes most of
the Person-to-person payments. But PayPal has a considerable chunk of revenue
coming from its third party payment processing business – enabling other
merchants on the web to sell items on their sites. This might very well be the
scope of Google Payments.
In the best case for PayPal, Google would stick to its
mission of organizing the world’s information and make it universally
accessible and thus would stick to enable people to buy and sell content.
In the worst case Google would venture into business to
consumer online payments including selling content as well as selling other
types of goods. As we will see later Google is investing a lot in its payments
project.

Google Wants a Big Piece of the Pie
In an announcement at the Arizona State Capitol
Google has said that it will open a new center in Phoenix
Arizona
.
The location will accommodate 600 engineering and support jobs. Douglas
Merrill, a senior director at Google told the audience that Arizona
was picked because of its high
quality of life and its good universities. AuctionBytes quotes Mike Sunnucks, a
reporter with The Business Journal in Phoenix
,
as saying that the location is a back office for many payment companies
including Bank of America and American Express.
A six hundred people operation is way beyond what industry
experts were expecting from the search company. This has sparked new rumors
that Google might be attempting an eBay rival site. If this is true then this
would go against Eric Schmitt's promise that his company is not interested in
person to person payments. But Schmitt has until now been upfront about his
company's ambitions. Like Google, PayPal is based in California
but has its operations in Omaha
, Nebraska
- close to Phoenix
.
Building defensive
fences
In a defensive move against payments incumbent Google, eBay
has recently changed its payment policy
to include forbidding its users to use a new payment system unless it is
approved by eBay itself. This does not include current non PayPal payment
methods.
In another defensive move PayPal acquired VeriSign’s payment
unit on the 10th of October 2005.
In addition the two companies agreed on cooperating on issues like identity
theft and two-factor authentication, a security technology.
PayPal’s acquisition of Verisign will fortify PayPal’s
position as a leader in this space. First, PayPal increased its number of
merchants by 100,000 merchants – mostly SMB’s (small and medium sized
businesses) with high volume / low margin transactions.
It is also worth noting that according to Gartner research
eBay’s market which is PayPal’s main source of revenue only constitutes 20% of
overall ecommerce payments, VeriSign’s acquisition would give PayPal a better
foothold in the remaining share of the market.
Gartner’s Avivah Litan argues that “PayPal could eventually
replace credit/debit cards as the dominant online payment mechanism, if it can
maintain low merchant rates while increasing customer service, responsiveness
and chargeback ease so that its policies and practices are as consumer-friendly
as are the card companies”.
If PayPal is in a position to threaten the credit card
goliaths then it is definitely in a position to limit the effects of Google’s
new payment product.
An ad-free
subset of the internet
Schmidt predicted there will always be ads on the Internet
but that there may be an "ad-free subset" of the Internet
that might offer a different way for people to pay for things, such as using
micro-payments.
PayPal’s importance to eBay
Since starting in 1999 with just 24 users, PayPal has
grown to 72 million account holders. The service processed payments totaling
$6.2 billion during the first quarter, with 71 percent of the activity
occurring in eBay's online auctions.
The service is becoming an
increasingly important source of revenue for San Jose-based eBay, which bought
PayPal for $1.3 billion in 2002.
PayPal generated $233.1 million,
or 23 percent, of eBay's revenue during the first quarter.
As for how eBay perceives Google Payments I will let Meg
Whitman, eBay’s CEO do the talking. In an interview with Forrester analyst
Charlene Li she said:
"We do a lot of business with Google and we
typically don't comment on rumors. What I can tell you is that PayPal has been
around since 1999. We've got 70 million accounts. Talk about the ability to
manage a new payment service. Think about the infrastructure that we've built
up over those six years in terms of customer support, fraud mitigation, the
ability to really understand and comply with all the laws that have gone into
place since 9/11.
This is a highly regulated space now, and something we've developed a real
expertise in. So we feel pretty good about our competitive position and the
fact we that we have critical mass here. But we actually don't mind
competition; it makes us better.''
Google has a track record of releasing great products but
great product features do not necessarily imply success. It’s hard to argue of
any better email product than Gmail but although Gmail has pulled off a feat
that would have been almost impossible for any other company to do, Hotmail and
Yahoo still have by far the highest share of email users worldwide.
I think it would be very difficult for Google to unseat
PayPal. PayPal owns a payment network and networks don’t just go away.
On the other hand I think the best move for Google would
be to stick to its mission of organizing the world’s information and making it
universally accessible - including premium content. And that means providing a
product that will enable content owners to sell their content and consumers to
buy it.
There is a clear vacuum in that area. I have worked in
the content payment industry and I have yet to see an easy-to-use web-based
product that makes it easy for publishers to monetize their content by selling
it to consumers.
I think that if Google manages to do to content payments
what it has done to online advertising then it would increase the size of the
pie and benefit itself and everyone else in that industry while at the same
time answering its those critics that say that all of Google’s eggs are in one
basket.
Google sees payments as a very important project for them.
In April 2005 Google incorporated Google Payment Corporation.
According to an analyst quoted by Red Herring Google may launch before the holidays. It’s going to
be interesting to see how the game is played.